Joshua F. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 2020001024 (June 14, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2020001024.pdf. michael sandel justice course syllabus. USPS EEOC Retaliation - McCready Law Alonzo N. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. A real socialist and internationalist strategy is needed to take control of communications infrastructure from the corporate ruling class and to place it into the hands of the working class worldwide. [9] These numbers reflect an increase in the percentage of Title VII settlements compared to 2016-2019. It is like living in a country, run by a dictator. by Kirk Angel | Mar 16, 2021 | EEOC, Employment Law, General | 0 comments. This represents a decrease of 482 employees from FY 2008 and a decrease of 794 employees since FY 2005. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's determination that Complainant did not show that he personally was subjected to conduct sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a hostile work environment based on race where Complainant did not witness most of the racially insensitive incidents alleged, he learned of the conduct second or third hand, he did not work at the office when the offensive conduct occurred, and the offensive behavior was not directed toward him; agreeing with the AJ's finding that the office where the conduct occurred was rife with offensive and racially hostile behavior, and given that substantial evidence established that other African-American employees were subjected to race-based conduct, the decision ordered the Agency to conduct training, to consider disciplining several identified Agency employees, and to post a notice. USPS employee wins discrimination and harassment claim with the EEOC. However, some of the funds were held back to ensure that all affected clerks would receive back pay. The Postal Service has a comprehensive workplace violence program to identify, review, report, and address employee assaults nationwide. Annalee D. v. General Services Administration, EEOC Request No. 0120162314 (June 5, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162314.txt. (This article first appeared in the January/February 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) On December 1, 2020, Arbitrator Sharnoff issued a decision confirming Clerk Craft jurisdiction over operation of the Small Parcel Sorting System. The claims, evidence, and legal briefs for all of our clients' relief claims have been submitted to the EEOC Administrative Judge. Frequently Asked Questions, Commissioner Charges and Directed Investigations, Office of Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion, Management Directives & Federal Sector Guidance, Federal Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution. Sang G. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Leora R. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. In 2021, we reported that non-career employees' turnover and injury rates were higher than career rates, both before and after we controlled for numerous factors such as employee tenure. 5, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_10/0120180519.pdf. 2021001733 (June 2, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2021001733.pdf. Based on Title VII charges alone, the EEOC collected $234,000,000 in monetary benefits in 2020. 0120180739 (June 21, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180739.pdf. Irvin M. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Complainant not entitled to personal relief for discriminatory non-selection where substantial evidence of record supported Administrative Judge's conclusion that Agency canceled the selection process because of a violation of the collective bargaining agreement and would not have selected Complainant for the position absent the discrimination. 25, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170498.pdf. 48-1 40-0062-06, the final agency decision (FAD) issued in connection 0120180917 (Oct. 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180917.pdf. 4~I1i.#3S*S6SS2+V18gtdm$0^FA !HS4$0I@T1 6
Complainant did nothing more than raise broad, across-the-board allegations of discriminatory policies and practices covering a variety of personnel processes, she was unable to establish that each allegation happened to every class member, and counsels actions raised concerns that the classs interests would not be protected. Arbitration Awards & Settlements Arbitration Clerk Jobs Bargaining Unit Work XOs`4ueYh;Ex=B,Dv4 RhA8eKw/VAFGVg(Iz8u.V:\Ms|(pAGn%A@%xK b8@8\Kx78 Y> &L
P dv0H4t0p40Ht00
@` h*D#8&i
4 a`M@, EEOC finds that a USPS employee claims of discrimination and retaliation were not sufficiently investigated by the agency. 0120171405 (Mar. 0120170218 (Dec. 21, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170218.txt. An official website of the United States government. Ashlee P. v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. In December 2011 the USPS announced that it planned to close more than half252 out of a total of 461of its mail processing centers, eliminating 28,000 positions and reducing the delivery of overnight first-class mail. 0120170498 (Apr.
Marquis K. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120172637 (Mar. 0120162491 (July 25, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162491.pdf. 0120162040 (Apr. The Agency provided insufficient evidence to support its dismissal of a complaint, on the basis that Complainant was not an Agency employee, where the record that the Agency submitted contained only the EEO Counselor's Report, the Notice of Right to File a Discrimination Complaint, and the formal complaint; the Agency did not provide any contracts or affidavits from management officials regarding the day-to-day responsibilities and management of Complainant's position. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. The complainant, a federal employee at the United States Postal Service, filed an EEO complaint against the USPS. EEOC resolved 70,804 charges in FY 2020 and increased its merit factor resolution rate to 17.4 percent from 15.6 percent the prior year. And the Unions are bed partners with Management. 131 M Street, NE
Home | NRP Class Action Dickerson v. Potter The settlement directed the Postal Service to pay $44.8 million directly to clerks and establish an escrow of $11.2 million to be disbursed in a manner determined by the union. Alena C. v. Dep't of State, EEOC Appeal No. Kylee C. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 2020001428 (Aug. 13, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2020001428.pdf. Agency's liability for compensatory damages extended back to the beginning of the sexual harassment, not the date that management became aware of it and failed to take prompt remedial action. 2019000778 (Nov. 27, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019000778.pdf. 3, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180568.pdf. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. The Administrative Judge's denial of class certification was appropriate where the putative class agent failed to establish that the class met the commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation requirements. On September 1, 2022 Arbitrator Joseph M. Sharnoff issued his latest national-level RI-399 award, this one concerning the Automated Delivery Unit Sorter (ADUS). Postal Service warns vaccine rules could affect deliveries, OSHA Vaccine Rule Applies to USPS Employees. Agency defense counsel may assist agency management officials and witnesses in the preparation of their affidavits during the investigative stage but may not instruct officials to make statements that are untrue or make changes to any affidavit without the affiant's approval of such changes; agency defense counsel also may assist agencies in informal resolution talks during the counseling stage so long as counsel suggests, but does not dictate, settlement terms. Reita M. v. Agency for International Development, EEOC Appeal No. 0120161017 (May 29, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161017.txt. Bertram K. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. In reversing the agencys final decision, the EEOC held that evidence from a health-care provider or other expert is not a mandatory prerequisite for recovery of compensatory damages for emotional harm. It went to state that: Objective evidence of compensatory damages can include statements from the Complainant concerning his emotional pain or suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, injury to professional standing, injury to character or reputation, injury to credit standing, loss of health and any other non-pecuniary losses that are incurred as a result of the discriminatory conduct. In addition to discrimination charges, in fiscal year 2020, the EEOC resolved 165 lawsuits and filed an additional 93 lawsuits. USPS employee wins discrimination and harassment claim with the EEOC Alline B. v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. EEOC Summarizes Policies on Monetary Awards. Postal Service Love Series Celebrates the Beauty and Delight of Flowers, USPS to end Priority Mail Prepaid Flat Rate Stamped Envelopes, USPS: Cyber Monday Is Next WeekFour Weeks Left for Holiday Shopping and Shipping, Michigan NALC Branch President Pleads Guilty to Embezzlement of $6,600, Postal Regulatory Commission Vice Chair Temporarily Assumes Administrative Responsibilities of the Agency, Biden to nominate 2 for USPS Board of Governors, oust DeJoy allies Bloom, Barger, New Orleans Letter Carrier Indicted for Delay or Destruction of Mail, U.S. Latarsha A. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, EEOC Appeal Nos. Thus the Commission limited its award of attorney fees to $1,000 based on an hourly rate of $250 per hour rather than the requested amount of $5,094.73. endstream
endobj
startxref
He was a part of the 130000 USPS Reaches $17.3M Disability Discrimination Settlement The Cost to your Company. Bart M. v. Dep't of the Interior, EEOC Appeal No. Administrative Judge properly ordered Agency to stop issuing cease-and-desist letters to employees who have reported discrimination, absent clear, documented evidence of some conduct (other than reporting discrimination) that the Agency reasonably concludes would warrant discipline in the absence of the employee's protected activity; issuing Complainant a cease-and-desist letter gave the appearance that Complainant, who complained of ongoing racial and sexual harassment, was just as culpable as her harasser. Postal Service who was subjected to a hostile work environment for over three years and then removed. LockA locked padlock Pay differential was based on a factor other than sex where male comparator was hired one year after complainants were hired, a different management official evaluated his application under different circumstances, and the different grade classifications were due to a difference in professional judgment by the evaluating officials. 511 0 obj
<>
endobj
Celine B. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone), Call 1-800-669-4000
She alleged that the USPS has subjected her to disability discrimination and harassment. Harriet M. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. USPS employee claims of discrimination and retaliation not sufficiently According to the decision, Phase 1 of NRP consisted largely of reviewing the files and medical records of all these employees; where needed requesting updated medical documentation from the employee; and verifying that current work actually being performed matched the current job offer. Allegations of retaliation by IRS Examiner and Taxpayer Advocate properly dismissed for failure to state a claim where actions at issue occurred to Complainant as a taxpayer, not as a former employee, and allegations constituted a collateral attack on the tax adjudication process. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, EEOC Appeal No. Class members should expect to receive written notice concerning the claim procedure within the next month. For our 2021 report, we analyzed USPS data from fiscal years 2016 through 2020 to determine turnover and injury rates. [email protected]
0120182156 (Sept. 12, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120182156.txt. Agency did not show that allowing Complainant to take Saturdays off for religious observances would have resulted in an undue hardship where Agency asserted that it could not do so without incurring overtime costs but made no effort to look into the possibility of schedule swaps or any other type of accommodation. 0720170019 (Aug. 3, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720170019.txt. Texas mail carrier wins $250,000 in discrimination lawsuit Administrative Judge properly determined that, where Complainant (through a retainer agreement) was being provided legal services at a reduced rate based on public-interest-minded reasons, the proper hourly rate was the prevailing rate at the time of the fee petition rather than the historical rate at the time the work was performed. All Rights Reserved, Disclaimer| Site Map| Privacy Policy |Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters, EEOC Awards $165,000 in Compensatory Damages, Adverse Action Not Permitted for Use of Approved Leave, Adverse Inference for Failure to Produce Documents, Agency Liable for Actions of Subordinate Employee, Agency Rationale Found to Be Pretext for Bias, Arbitral Review of Adverse Actions, Part 1, Attorney Fees Awarded Where Penalty Mitigated, Award Increased in Discrimination Finding, Benefit of Doubt when Representing Oneself, Board Clarifies Jurisdiction for Disabled Veterans, Career Intern Program Violates Veterans Preference, Claim against Agency by IPA Employee Allowed, Claim for Damages and Fees Gets Second Look, Complainants Role in EEO Investigation Part 2, Constructive Notice Bars Summary Judgment, Court Finds No Adverse Employment Action or Reprisal, Court Remands Case for Review of Suggestion Award, Court Rules Against Former Spouse Survivor Annuity, Definition of Disability under the Rehabilitation Act, Disability Discrimination by State Department, Disability Retirement and Discrimination Claims, Discrimination Due to Age, Union Activities, EEO Representative Has Viable Claim of Retaliation, EEOC Awards Substantial Compensatory Damages, EEOC Denies Agencys Request for Reconsideration, EEOC Sustains Discrimination Claim of FAA Employee, Employee Not Entitled to Accommodation for Spouse, Employee Wins at EEOC after Decade-Long Fight, Equal Pay Act Plaintiffs Must Prove Sex Discrimination, Failure to Comply with Law Judges Orders, Failure to Reassign Violates Rehabilitation Act, FEGLI Beneficiary Designation Trumps State Law, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination, Part 1, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination, Part 2, Going Straight to Court with EEO Complaint, Harassment Based on Perceived Sexual Orientation, Hearing Ordered in Involuntary Resignation Case, Hostile Work Environment and Compensation Claims, Hostile Work Environment Harassment Based on Gender, Importance of Impartial Investigations Stressed, Jurisdiction Argument after Delay in Appeal, Lateral Transfer Can be Adverse Job Action, Mixed Motives in Age Discrimination Cases, Modification of Work Schedule as Reasonable Accommodation, MSPB Applies Ruling Limiting Appeal Rights, MSPB Jurisdiction Over Newer FAA Employees, MSPB May Review OPM Suitability Determinations, MSPB Mitigates Penalty for Hatch Act Violation, MSPB Upholds Former Park Police Chiefs Removal, MSPB Upholds Removal for False Medal Claim, New Decision on Management-Directed Reassignment, NSPS Cant Impose New Probationary Period, Performance Improvement Plan Not an Adverse Action, Physician Protected Under Whistleblower Law, Pre-Enactment USERRA Jurisdiction Affirmed By Federal Circuit, Protections for Legislative Branch Employees, Reassignment of Harassment Victim Reversed, Recommended Changes to EEOC Regulations and Procedures, Resignation Reversed Due to Misinformation, Retaliation Not Covered in Age Discrimination Case, Revocation of Accommodation may be Discriminatory, Sleep Impairment a Disability Under Rehabilitation Act, Suit against Manager in Personal Capacity, Supervisors Comments Could Have Chilling Effect, Supporting a Hostile Work Environment Claim, Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Cats Paw Theory, Supreme Court Simplifies Mixed Case Appeals, Survivor Lacks Standing to Bring EEO Claim, Telecommuting as Reasonable Accommodation, Temporary Demotion States Cause of Action, Threat of Discipline Found to be Reprisal, Tolling of Deadlines for Filing Veterans Preference Complaints, TSA Not Immune To Rehabilitation Act Claims, TSA Screener Applicants Exempt from Rehabilitation Act, U.S. District Court Denies Summary Judgment, Unionists Access to Agency System Upheld, Untimely Disability Retirement Application, Whistleblower Compensation Provision Not Retroactive, Whistleblower Legislation Advances in Congress, Whistleblower Reprisal Found, Relief Ordered.